Debate on "Internet has more bad effect than good " | 3rd Speaker|

 Identify: "Internet has more bad effect than good "

 

( 3rd Speaker)  

Creation:

The arrival of the internet has undeniably revolutionized the world, connecting humans from all corners of the globe and offering remarkable get right of entry to to statistics. but, amidst its infinite blessings, there exists a developing problem that the net's negative results outweigh the high quality ones. this text offers a recap of a debate held at M A Rashid Memorial Academy on October 29, 2022, in which two teams passionately argued the motion that the internet has greater terrible effects than good. in the end, the group opposing the motion emerged triumphant, shedding mild at the dark facet of the net.

The debate competition:

the debate opposition at M A Rashid Memorial Academy introduced collectively  teams led by using Hasib Al Hasan and Fardin Mondol, representing the opponents and the motion, respectively. both teams provided compelling arguments, exploring the various facets of the net's effect on society.

Terrible effects Explored:

Hasib Al Hasan, leading the opposing group, emphasised the adverse effects related to the net. The group highlighted concerns which includes cyberbullying, on-line harassment, invasion of privateness, and the unfold of incorrect information. They argued that these troubles have caused an increase in intellectual fitness problems, compromised private relationships, and a lower in ordinary societal nicely-being.

The group similarly emphasised the addictive nature of the internet, stating the immoderate use of social media and on line gaming, that could negatively effect productiveness, awareness, or even physical health. They highlighted the growing virtual divide, wherein get right of entry to to the net is unequally dispensed, perpetuating social and financial disparities.

Counterarguments and the movement's Stance:

Fardin Mondol, leading the crew in want of the movement, recounted the negative factors of the net however argued that the fine results a ways outweighed them. The group highlighted the internet's role in increasing academic possibilities, fostering international connectivity, and improving communication and collaboration. They emphasised how the internet has revolutionized industries, growing new job opportunities and boosting financial increase.

Moreover, the team talked about the net's instrumental role in enabling access to critical records and services, in particular in faraway regions. They argued that the internet has empowered marginalized communities, facilitated social activism, and amplified diverse voices.

The decision:

After a fierce and idea-provoking debate, the group opposing the movement emerged because the winners. Their compelling arguments successfully shed light at the terrible elements of the internet and garnered guide from the judges and target audience.

Conclusion:

The talk at M A Rashid Memorial Academy sparked vital discussions about the net's impact on society, that specialize in its poor consequences. at the same time as the internet undeniably brings numerous advantages, it's miles crucial to renowned and cope with the developing concerns regarding its unfavourable results. This debate serves as a reminder to significantly evaluate the outcomes of the internet and work in the direction of harnessing its potential for suitable whilst mitigating the harms it could inflict upon individuals and groups.